Criteria

NN

PA

CR

DI

HD

Theoretical knowledge

Inadequate or inappropriate   summary of theory/research   relevant to the topic

Satisfactory summary of appropriate theory/research relevant to the topic

Consistent and perceptive demonstration of knowledge of educational theory

Excellent, high quality, summary of appropriate theory/research relevant to the topic

Highly relevant and a sophisticated understanding of educational theory in the Arts.

Educational investigation

Inadequate investigation and description of educational applications of theoretical and research concepts to analysis of psychological investigation

Competent investigation and discussion of psychological applications of     theoretical and research concepts to analysis of educational investigation

Analyses and synthesizes at a thorough and perceptive level. Discourse lively and stimulating

Insightful, critically reflective investigation and discussion of psychological applications to educational investigation

Exceptional analysis and synthesis. An intelligent, perceptive and articulate exploration of educational psychology praxis. Highly stimulating discourse with a mature understanding of educational psychology praxis

Quality of preparation and presentation

Poor understanding of the topic

Ideas not explained clearly

Written report has poor literary   standards

Poor preparation, written report   not provided for group members

Peer and self evaluation forms not provided, or not submitted

Satisfactory understanding of topic.

Ideas explained clearly and coherently.

Written report has appropriate   literary standards.

Presentation well prepared, written report provided for group members

Peer and self evaluation forms     provided, completed and submitted 

Well-developed understanding of topic with commendable preparation.

Consistently accurate exploration of ideas and appropriate educational concepts.

Fluent and well-developed written work.

Peer and self evaluation forms     provided, completed and submitted 

Sophisticated understanding of topic.

Comprehensive exploration of ideas.

High quality written report.

Very good preparation, written report provided for group members

Peer and self evaluation forms provided, completed and submitted 

Outstanding comprehension of the topic

Extensive exploration of ideas

Report of high academic quality written with high levels of accuracy and scholarly language.

Exemplary preparation, written report provided for group members

Peer and self evaluation forms provided, completed and submitted

Possible result

Your result

Comments

1. All components of the task are included.

2.  Demonstrated understanding of the concepts.

3.  Appropriate use of subject specific terminology.

4.  Evidence of locating, selecting and organising relevant information from a variety of sources.

1

2

1

2

1.  Evidence of ideas having been analysed and synthesised.

2.  Depth and validity of content.

3.  Appropriate conclusions drawn from the information presented.

4.  Identification of relevant issue/s for discussion.

2

2

2

2

1.  Creative presentation of content using a variety of forms.

2.  Evidence of teamwork.

3.  Effective use of oral or written language conventions.

5.  Adherence to time limit.

6.  Correct use of referencing style (APA).

2

1

1

1

1

Total

20